Breaking
Sponsor Advertisement
Adviser Details Alleged Internal Sabotage Against Trump Administration
Image for: Adviser Details Alleged Internal Sabotage Against Trump Administration

Adviser Details Alleged Internal Sabotage Against Trump Administration

Calley Means, a former adviser, recently made significant allegations on the "Joe Rogan Experience." He claimed federal bureaucrats are actively working to sabotage President Donald Trump's administration from within.
Jump to The Flipside Perspectives

Calley Means, a former adviser to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., recently alleged widespread internal sabotage within President Donald Trump's administration. Speaking on the "Joe Rogan Experience" in an episode released Friday, Means claimed that federal bureaucrats are actively working to undermine the presidency from the inside. He specifically cited the circulation of a "Simple Sabotage Field Manual," a guide originally developed by the Office of Strategic Services during World War II, among government employees.

"They were sending around a memo — a CIA manual — about how to be a bad bureaucrat and subvert an institution from within." Calley Means, Former Adviser to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The "Simple Sabotage Field Manual," a precursor to modern intelligence tactics, was designed to guide individuals in enemy-held territory on how to disrupt operations through seemingly innocuous acts. Means stated that this manual, which advises tactics such as penalizing efficient workers, promoting unqualified individuals, and funneling tasks into large, inefficient committees, is now being used by career officials within the current federal workforce. Means asserted, "They were sending around a memo — a CIA manual — about how to be a bad bureaucrat and subvert an institution from within." He explicitly attributed this behavior to officials who he claimed "hate President Trump."

Means, who resigned from the White House on October 22, previously served as an adviser to Secretary Kennedy, whose department, Health and Human Services, he estimated employs 90,000 individuals. He painted a stark picture of the environment surrounding his former boss, stating, "He’s [Kennedy] got a 90,000-person agency. He’s surrounded by demons who want him out and want him destroyed." Means extended this observation to the broader federal government, noting that President Trump oversees a workforce of approximately two million people. When pressed by Rogan about whether President Trump's staff was "completely compromised," Means responded, "Yeah, for the most … especially the whole infrastructure."

The allegations suggest a deeply entrenched resistance within the federal bureaucracy that could impede the administration's policy objectives during its final two years. Means clarified that while he was not making excuses for anyone, the scale of the alleged internal opposition presented a significant challenge. He described the situation as "kind of crazy, right? Like, what the hell do I do? This is an unruly government and the president has orders of magnitude more than that."

Means contended that the alleged internal resistance has contributed to a slowdown in the aggressive implementation of policies President Trump campaigned on, many of which he described as "widely popular." He suggested that a "severe consolidation of power" by career officials, capitalizing on the President's demanding schedule, has been used to delay various initiatives. Despite these challenges, Means expressed confidence in President Trump's ability to address the situation. He stated, "But yes, he can make a change to his staff."

Means concluded by emphasizing President Trump's awareness of the individuals around him, suggesting the President knows who is loyal and committed to his agenda. "The president knows who the people are that are not going to sell him out to a foreign government. The president knows the people around him that will try to go hard to really drive some compelling change … to have an impact on the country he wants to have." The Daily Caller News Foundation previously reported that the 2026 midterm elections saw Democrats gain control of both chambers of Congress. An NBC News exit poll from those elections indicated that 43 percent of respondents cited rebuking President Trump's performance as a reason for their vote, providing a backdrop to discussions about administrative effectiveness and internal dynamics. The White House has not yet responded to requests for comment regarding Means' allegations.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

Progressives often view the role of career civil servants differently, emphasizing their expertise, institutional knowledge, and the importance of checks and balances within government. While deliberate sabotage is broadly condemned, the allegations by Calley Means raise questions about the complex dynamics between political appointees and the permanent bureaucracy. From a progressive standpoint, civil servants are often seen as guardians of public interest and institutional norms, providing continuity and expertise that transcends political cycles. Concerns about "sabotage" could be interpreted as resistance to policies perceived as harmful, poorly conceived, or contrary to established ethical guidelines and scientific consensus. The "deep state" narrative, often associated with such claims, is frequently viewed by progressives as a tactic to delegitimize legitimate oversight and expertise, potentially paving the way for unchecked executive power. Progressives might argue that if policies are indeed being "slowed down," it could be due to legitimate concerns about their feasibility, legality, or potential negative impacts on social justice, equity, or collective well-being. Ensuring that government functions effectively and ethically requires a balance between executive authority and the professional integrity of the civil service, rather than simply dismissing all internal resistance as malicious.

Conservative View

From a conservative perspective, Calley Means' allegations highlight a critical concern regarding the power and accountability of unelected bureaucrats within the federal government. The notion of career officials actively working to subvert an elected president's agenda strikes at the core of democratic principles and threatens the mandate given by voters. Conservatives often emphasize limited government and the importance of allowing elected officials to implement their policies without undue interference from a permanent administrative state. The alleged circulation of a "sabotage manual" suggests a deliberate effort to undermine the executive branch, leading to inefficiency and a lack of responsiveness to the public will. This perceived "deep state" resistance can be seen as a direct challenge to individual liberty and the free market, as it impedes the implementation of policies aimed at deregulation, tax cuts, or other conservative priorities. For many conservatives, this situation underscores the urgent need for greater accountability, transparency, and the assertion of presidential authority to ensure that the federal workforce serves the nation's interests as defined by its elected leadership, rather than pursuing its own agenda. Strong executive action to identify and remove such saboteurs would be viewed as essential to restoring proper governance and preventing the erosion of democratic institutions.

Common Ground

Despite differing interpretations, there are areas of common ground regarding government efficiency and accountability. Both conservatives and progressives can agree that a federal government should operate transparently and effectively, serving the American people without undue internal obstruction. There is shared interest in ensuring that public servants, regardless of their political leanings, uphold their professional duties and implement lawful directives. The concept of a "sabotage manual" circulating within government raises concerns for anyone who values functional governance, as it implies deliberate inefficiency and a waste of taxpayer resources. Both sides can advocate for clear lines of authority, ethical conduct within the civil service, and mechanisms to address legitimate concerns about policy implementation without resorting to covert obstruction. Fostering an environment where civil servants feel empowered to voice concerns through appropriate channels, while also respecting the democratic mandate of elected officials, is crucial. Ultimately, ensuring that the federal bureaucracy is both responsive to elected leadership and operates with integrity is a shared goal for a healthy democracy.

What's your view on this story? Share your thoughts and remember to consider multiple perspectives and being respectful when forming and voicing your opinion. "If you resort to personal attacks, you have already lost the debate..."

Advertisement

Contact Us About This Article

Have a question or comment about this article? We'd love to hear from you.

About Fair Side News

At Fair Side News, we believe in presenting news with perspectives from both sides of the political spectrum. Our goal is to help readers understand different viewpoints and find common ground on important issues.