Breaking
Sponsor Advertisement
Federal Records Detail Crooks' Pre-Attack Firearms Interest
Image for: Federal Records Detail Crooks' Pre-Attack Firearms Interest

Federal Records Detail Crooks' Pre-Attack Firearms Interest

Newly disclosed federal records offer insights into Thomas Crooks' growing interest in firearms. Crooks attempted to assassinate President Donald Trump on July 13, 2024. His father reportedly noticed Crooks watching him unlock a gun safe.
Jump to The Flipside Perspectives

Newly disclosed federal records shed light on the developing interest in firearms held by Thomas Matthew Crooks, the individual who attempted to assassinate President Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, 2024. These documents, reviewed by the New York Post and provided to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), detail Crooks' behavior and his father's observations in the months leading up to the attack.

"He had ulterior motives, which became apparent the minute he pulled that trigger." Matthew Crooks, Father of Thomas Crooks.

According to the federal records, Crooks' father, Matthew Crooks, frequently changed the combination to his gun safe. He took this precaution after noticing his son observing him as he entered the code. Despite these efforts, on the morning of the attack, Matthew Crooks personally retrieved a Panther Arms A-15 rifle from the safe and gave it to his son. He reportedly believed Thomas intended to visit a shooting range, a common activity for the younger Crooks. Hours later, the 20-year-old used that same rifle to fire eight rounds toward President Trump from the roof of a building outside the rally's security perimeter.

The records indicate that Matthew Crooks had witnessed concerning behavior from his son shortly before the incident. On July 7, just six days prior to the attack, Matthew observed Thomas through a home surveillance camera. The younger Crooks was seen cleaning a firearm in the family's garage, pacing, moving his arms "up and down," and speaking frantically, making little sense. Matthew also recalled an "odd" conversation in which Thomas inquired about the necessity of a background check to purchase his father's Glock pistol.

Investigators learned that firearms had become a frequent topic in the limited conversations between father and son. Matthew told federal agents that his son's interest in guns began during the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, Thomas was described as a "terrible" shooter, struggling to hit paper targets. An FBI summary of Matthew’s interview stated, "He could not hit the paper." The father estimated that Thomas practiced for four or five years, eventually becoming capable of reliably hitting a target. Federal records also noted Crooks' developing interest in long-range shooting.

Beyond the immediate family observations, the federal investigation uncovered other facets of Crooks' activities. Investigators determined that the Panther Arms A-15 rifle used in the attack was legally purchased by Crooks' father. The FBI had stated early in its investigation that Crooks appeared to have acted alone and was not known to the bureau prior to the incident. Other federal documents revealed that Crooks used the alias "Bob Dole" when purchasing firearm-related products online. Investigators identified at least 35 digital accounts associated with him, including foreign email addresses, although the FBI found no evidence of foreign direction or involvement. Additionally, Crooks reportedly attempted to produce a Glock-style handgun using a 3D printer.

The day before the assassination attempt, Crooks practiced at a shooting range. On the morning of July 13, he purchased 50 rounds of ammunition and drove alone to the Butler Farm Show grounds, according to an intelligence briefing obtained by the Associated Press. Federal investigators later recovered explosive devices from Crooks' vehicle and residence. However, these devices were found to be incapable of detonating in their assembled state.

The assassination attempt resulted in significant casualties. One bullet struck President Trump in the right ear, causing injury. Rally attendee Corey Comperatore was killed, and David Dutch and James Copenhaver sustained serious injuries. A Secret Service counter-sniper swiftly neutralized Crooks seconds after he opened fire. Despite the extensive investigation, federal authorities have not publicly identified a definitive motive for Crooks' actions. Matthew Crooks told investigators that his son had shown little apparent political interest and had never expressed any plans to attack President Trump. Records indicate Crooks was registered as a Republican but had made a small donation to a progressive voter-turnout organization. The ongoing investigation by Sen. Grassley and federal agencies continues to seek a comprehensive understanding of the events and the motivations behind the attack.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The newly released federal records underscore the urgent need for comprehensive gun violence prevention strategies. The details surrounding Thomas Crooks' escalating interest in firearms, his erratic behavior, and the ease with which he accessed a semi-automatic rifle, despite his father's initial precautions, highlight systemic vulnerabilities. This incident, an attempted assassination of a sitting President that also resulted in a fatality and multiple injuries, demonstrates the devastating consequences of unchecked access to powerful weapons. The fact that explosive devices were also found, even if non-detonable, points to a broader pattern of dangerous intent. Progressives argue that "red flag" laws, which allow temporary removal of firearms from individuals deemed a danger to themselves or others by a court, could be a vital tool in preventing such tragedies. Furthermore, the lack of a clear motive in this case emphasizes the need for robust public health approaches to gun violence, including mental health support and early intervention programs that address underlying issues that may lead to radicalization or violence. Relying solely on individual vigilance is insufficient when the risks are so high for collective well-being and public safety.

Conservative View

The revelations from federal records highlight a critical need for individual responsibility and heightened awareness among gun owners regarding the security of their firearms. While the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms, it is incumbent upon gun owners to ensure their weapons are not misused, especially by individuals who may exhibit concerning behaviors. The father's repeated changing of the gun safe combination demonstrates an attempt at responsible gun storage, yet the ultimate decision to provide the rifle to his son underscores the complexities of personal judgment. This incident, an attempted assassination of a sitting President, underscores the importance of thorough investigations into motives, particularly when there is no clear political or ideological alignment. It also raises questions about mental health support and the potential for early intervention when individuals display erratic or concerning conduct, without infringing on constitutional rights. Conservatives emphasize that legal gun ownership is not the issue, but rather the actions of individuals and the enforcement of existing laws. The focus should be on personal accountability and preventing criminal acts through vigilance and appropriate responses to warning signs, rather than broad restrictions on law-abiding citizens.

Common Ground

Regardless of political affiliation, the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump and the resulting casualties represent a profound tragedy that demands a thorough and impartial investigation. Both conservatives and progressives can agree on the fundamental importance of preventing violence and ensuring the safety of public figures and citizens alike. There is shared ground in acknowledging the need for responsible gun ownership, which includes secure storage and vigilance regarding individuals who may pose a threat. Furthermore, both sides can support initiatives aimed at improving mental health services and early intervention programs for individuals exhibiting concerning behaviors. A bipartisan approach could focus on strengthening community-based programs that identify and support individuals at risk of violence, without resorting to overly broad or ineffective measures. Emphasizing victim support and ensuring that investigations into such high-profile attacks are comprehensive and transparent also serve as areas of common agreement, reinforcing the rule of law and public trust.

What's your view on this story? Share your thoughts and remember to consider multiple perspectives and being respectful when forming and voicing your opinion. "If you resort to personal attacks, you have already lost the debate..."

Advertisement

Contact Us About This Article

Have a question or comment about this article? We'd love to hear from you.

About Fair Side News

At Fair Side News, we believe in presenting news with perspectives from both sides of the political spectrum. Our goal is to help readers understand different viewpoints and find common ground on important issues.