Breaking
Sponsor Advertisement
Newsom Affair Details Resurface in Ex-Mistress's Essay
Image for: Newsom Affair Details Resurface in Ex-Mistress's Essay

Newsom Affair Details Resurface in Ex-Mistress's Essay

Ruby Rippey has published a detailed personal essay in Vanity Fair, recounting her 2007 affair with then-San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. The essay includes new details and claims, including alleged advice from Kamala Harris during the fallout and challenges to Newsom's past account.
Jump to The Flipside Perspectives

A political scandal that initially made headlines in 2007 has resurfaced this week, driven by a new first-person account from Ruby Rippey, the woman at the center of the affair with then-San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. Rippey published a personal essay in Vanity Fair on Tuesday, offering her detailed version of events surrounding the relationship, which occurred while she served as Newsom's appointments secretary and her husband, Alex Tourk, managed Newsom’s campaign.

"She listens, then says simply: ‘I wouldn’t say anything right now, Ruby. Just pause. More time will give you better perspective." — Ruby Rippey, Author of Vanity Fair Essay

The essay's most striking revelation involves Kamala Harris, who was San Francisco's District Attorney when the scandal became public. Rippey alleges that Harris reached out privately to offer guidance during the immediate fallout. According to Rippey, Harris advised her against speaking publicly or pursuing a book deal at that time. Rippey recalled the exchange in her essay: "She listens, then says simply: ‘I wouldn’t say anything right now, Ruby. Just pause. More time will give you better perspective.'" As of publication, neither Harris nor any representative on her behalf has issued a public response to these claims.

Beyond the alleged interaction with Harris, Rippey's essay directly challenges aspects of Newsom’s own retelling of events in his memoir. Rippey disputes Newsom's claim that he was the one who "came clean" to Tourk, asserting that she had already confessed the affair to her husband before Newsom's conversation with his campaign manager. Rippey recounted asking a Newsom advisor point-blank whether the governor’s memoir was truthful, to which the advisor reportedly replied, "Well, we all remember things differently, don’t we, Ruby?"

Rippey's essay provides a step-by-step account of the affair's origins, which she states began during her tenure at City Hall. She described a pattern of encounters, including time spent together in a hot tub, overnight stays in hotels, and visits to Newsom's penthouse on Russian Hill. One passage details a specific trip to The Carneros Inn. Rippey wrote, “The next clear memory is getting into the back of my boss’s chauffeured town car, heading to The Carneros Inn.” She further elaborated on the journey: “I stretch my legs across the center console and let my heels fall off. He is in the front seat. He takes one of my feet and begins to massage it, the gesture half-hidden inside the loud car.” Rippey describes waking up next to Newsom the following morning, indicating that the affair continued for several months.

She characterized the underlying dynamic of the relationship in candid terms, stating, “We meet and we drink. There is sex, but it isn’t the point. The point is proximity — to power, to being chosen, to feeling newly visible — no longer muted by pregnancy, by new motherhood, by the strain of white-knuckling long stretches of sobriety.” Rippey also recounted a comment Newsom allegedly made after the birth of her first child, during a meal at a Mexican restaurant, where she says he told her, “Hey — you look really good … You’ve lost all your pregnancy weight.”

While Rippey acknowledged her own agency in entering the affair willingly, she noted that hindsight had altered her perspective on the inherent power imbalance. She wrote that “power does not need to coerce. It only needs to exist.” The affair became public knowledge after Rippey informed her husband via email, which led Tourk to confront Newsom directly and resign from the campaign immediately. Newsom publicly admitted to the affair during a 2007 news conference shortly thereafter, also announcing his intention to seek treatment for alcohol abuse.

Rippey's essay extends beyond the affair itself, chronicling her subsequent struggle with alcoholism, the eventual dissolution of her marriage, and her long journey toward sobriety in the years that followed. Fox News Digital obtained a statement from a Newsom spokesperson responding to the essay’s publication. The statement read, “The Governor acknowledged his role and publicly apologized nearly two decades ago when he was still mayor.” The spokesperson added that Newsom has since remarried, started a family, and shifted his focus toward his official duties. The statement concluded that Newsom “addressed this chapter of his life, including in his memoir, and out of respect for everyone involved, does not have anything further to add.”

The resurfacing of these details, particularly those involving Kamala Harris, brings renewed attention to a past political scandal that continues to resonate due to the prominence of the figures involved today.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The new essay by Ruby Rippey offers a critical re-examination of power dynamics within relationships, particularly in a professional context, which aligns with progressive concerns about social justice and equity. Rippey's reflection that "power does not need to coerce. It only needs to exist" highlights the systemic imbalance between a high-ranking official like then-Mayor Newsom and an appointments secretary. This perspective emphasizes that even consensual relationships can be shaped by inherent power differentials, making it difficult for the subordinate party to fully exercise autonomy without professional repercussions.

From a progressive standpoint, the focus shifts from individual blame to understanding the broader context and structures that enable such situations. While acknowledging Governor Newsom's past apology and personal growth, Rippey's account provides a valuable, often unheard, perspective on the toll such events take on the less powerful individual. The alleged advice from Kamala Harris, viewed through a progressive lens, could be interpreted as a pragmatic attempt to protect a vulnerable individual from further public scrutiny and media exploitation during a tumultuous period, rather than an effort to suppress truth. Ultimately, this story underscores the importance of fostering workplace environments that prioritize equity, respect, and clear boundaries to prevent the exploitation of power imbalances.

Conservative View

The resurfacing of details surrounding Governor Gavin Newsom's 2007 affair, particularly the alleged involvement of then-District Attorney Kamala Harris, raises questions about transparency and accountability among public officials. Conservatives often emphasize the importance of personal responsibility and ethical conduct for those in positions of power, viewing such matters as indicative of character and trustworthiness. The claim that Harris advised Rippey against speaking publicly or pursuing a book deal could be seen as an attempt to control the narrative or suppress information, rather than encouraging full disclosure, which runs counter to principles of open government.

For conservatives, the actions of public figures, even in their private lives, inevitably reflect on their ability to serve with integrity. The power dynamics highlighted by Rippey, where "power does not need to coerce. It only needs to exist," underscore the ethical obligations of those in authority to avoid situations that could exploit or compromise subordinates. While Governor Newsom issued an apology years ago, the new details and challenges to his previous account highlight the ongoing public interest in the completeness and accuracy of statements made by elected officials regarding their past conduct. Such revelations reinforce the conservative belief that public trust is fragile and requires unwavering commitment to honesty and ethical standards, both in and out of office.

Common Ground

Regardless of political affiliation, there is broad agreement on the importance of ethical conduct and integrity for individuals in public service. Both conservatives and progressives can concur that public officials hold a unique position of trust and that their actions, both personal and professional, can impact public confidence. The need for transparency, even if delayed, is a shared value, allowing for a more complete understanding of past events and accountability.

Furthermore, the story highlights the universal challenge of addiction, as Rippey openly discusses her struggles with alcoholism and her journey to sobriety. There is bipartisan support for individuals seeking help for addiction, recognizing it as a public health issue that requires compassion and resources. Finally, the narrative underscores the complexity of human relationships and the difficulty of navigating personal challenges under public scrutiny. While perspectives on the specifics may differ, there is common ground in acknowledging the human element of these stories and the potential for personal growth and redemption over time.

What's your view on this story? Share your thoughts and remember to consider multiple perspectives and being respectful when forming and voicing your opinion. "If you resort to personal attacks, you have already lost the debate..."

Advertisement

Contact Us About This Article

Have a question or comment about this article? We'd love to hear from you.

About Fair Side News

At Fair Side News, we believe in presenting news with perspectives from both sides of the political spectrum. Our goal is to help readers understand different viewpoints and find common ground on important issues.