Breaking
Sponsor Advertisement
Podcaster Arrested Over Alleged Threats Against President Trump
Image for: Podcaster Arrested Over Alleged Threats Against President Trump

Podcaster Arrested Over Alleged Threats Against President Trump

Podcaster Benjamin Southworth was arrested on federal charges. He faces allegations of threatening President Donald Trump. Trump's personal attorney was also targeted by Southworth. The attorney's family reportedly faced harassment. A federal grand jury issued an indictment.
Jump to The Flipside Perspectives

A Los Angeles podcaster, Benjamin Azariah Southworth, 40, was taken into federal custody Thursday morning on charges of repeatedly threatening to kill President Donald Trump. Prosecutors further allege Southworth targeted the President’s longtime personal attorney and members of that lawyer’s family through cyberstalking and harassing telephone calls.

"We will hold perpetrators of violent threats accountable." Attorney General Todd Blanche, U.S. Department of Justice

The arrest in Southworth's Westlake neighborhood residence followed a three-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury one day earlier. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California announced that Southworth faces one count of making threats against the president, one count of cyberstalking, and one count of making harassing interstate telephone calls. The Justice Department, in court documents, identified the attorney only as "Victim 1," though news reports have named him as Jay Sekulow, a prominent legal figure who has served as President Trump's personal attorney.

Federal prosecutors allege that Southworth utilized multiple social media platforms and a personal website, Holy Menace, between January and May 2026, to publish threats against President Trump. These online activities reportedly included encouraging harassment of the President and his supporters. Southworth, who previously hosted the Christian reality and music television program "The Remix" on TBN and later co-hosted the comedy podcast "Yass, Jesus!," described himself as an "artivist" on his website, where he also sold political merchandise.

The federal indictment details specific instances where Southworth's online conduct allegedly escalated beyond political criticism into explicit threats of violence. In an Instagram video posted on April 7, prosecutors claim Southworth stated he had been “vocal in calling for the execution” of President Trump, before declaring, “It’s time for course correction. Kill Donald Trump.” Court documents also describe private messages allegedly sent by Southworth months earlier, in which he discussed potential actions if he were to encounter a Trump administration official in person.

The alleged harassment extended to President Trump’s personal attorney and his family. In January, Southworth is accused of posting the attorney’s home address on TikTok, accompanied by a photograph of the lawyer and an image of his residence. The post reportedly included the message, “No peace for traitors.” The indictment further states that Southworth left abusive online messages and voicemails for the attorney’s son between January and May 2026. Additionally, he allegedly made repeated interstate telephone calls to the attorney’s wife, with prosecutors noting at least 13 such calls. In one alleged voicemail, Southworth warned that “justice” would eventually come to the family’s door. Federal authorities also accuse Southworth of publicly posting telephone numbers belonging to the attorney’s relatives in February, urging others to contact them.

Additional videos and posts were highlighted by federal authorities in building their case. Prosecutors allege that on March 31, Southworth posted another video making explicit remarks about killing President Trump, following a discussion about a Supreme Court decision concerning conversion-therapy restrictions. A week later, the April 7 video with the direct call for President Trump's death was posted. Another video allegedly depicted Southworth appearing to teleport into the White House before raising a knife behind an image of the President. While court documents cited in reports indicate Southworth later described some of his comments as “just rhetoric,” prosecutors maintain that the threatening statements persisted.

Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a statement following the arrest, emphasizing the Justice Department's commitment to responding to threats against the President with the “full force of the law.” Blanche stated, “We will hold perpetrators of violent threats accountable.” First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli echoed this sentiment, asserting "zero tolerance for political violence" and noting that threatening elected officials can lead to arrest and prosecution. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Secret Service jointly investigated the case.

Federal officials underscored that the indictment contains allegations, and Southworth is presumed innocent unless prosecutors prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. If convicted, Southworth faces a statutory maximum of five years in federal prison for the charge of threatening the president, another five years for cyberstalking, and up to two years for telephone harassment. The arrest serves as a potent reminder of the legal consequences associated with escalating political rhetoric into alleged threats of violence.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

While condemning any form of political violence or threats, this incident also prompts progressives to consider the broader context of political polarization and its potential consequences. The escalating rhetoric across the political spectrum can contribute to an environment where individuals feel justified in expressing extreme views, sometimes crossing into illegal threats. It is crucial to ensure that due process is followed for Benjamin Southworth and that the legal system operates fairly. Beyond individual accountability, progressives emphasize addressing systemic issues that fuel division and anger. This includes fostering healthier public discourse, promoting empathy, and seeking common ground rather than demonizing political opponents. While upholding the law is paramount, it is also important to understand the societal factors that might lead individuals to such desperate actions. Ensuring justice means not only punishing illegal acts but also working towards a society where political differences do not lead to calls for violence.

Conservative View

The arrest of Benjamin Southworth underscores a critical principle for conservatives: the rule of law must be upheld without exception, especially when it concerns threats against public officials. Free speech is a cornerstone of American liberty, but it does not extend to inciting violence or making credible threats against any individual, least of all the sitting President. This case highlights the importance of personal responsibility; individuals are accountable for their actions and words, particularly in the public sphere. The Justice Department's swift action demonstrates a commitment to maintaining order and protecting the integrity of democratic processes. Allowing such threats to go unaddressed would erode public safety and encourage a dangerous environment where political discourse devolves into violent intimidation. Conservatives believe in limited government, but also in a strong government capable of enforcing laws and ensuring the safety of its citizens and leaders. This incident serves as a stark reminder that regardless of political affiliation, threats of violence are unacceptable and will be met with the full force of federal law.

Common Ground

Across the political spectrum, there is fundamental agreement that threats of violence against any individual, particularly elected officials, are unacceptable and undermine the fabric of a civil society. Both conservatives and progressives can unite in condemning actions that seek to intimidate or harm public servants. The importance of the rule of law and ensuring that justice is administered fairly and impartially is a shared value. There is common ground in upholding the principle that while freedom of speech is vital, it does not provide cover for incitement to violence or credible threats. Furthermore, both sides can agree on the need for robust investigations by federal agencies like the FBI and Secret Service to protect public figures and maintain national security. Ultimately, a healthy democracy requires peaceful discourse and the rejection of violence as a means of political expression, a principle that transcends ideological divides.

What's your view on this story? Share your thoughts and remember to consider multiple perspectives and being respectful when forming and voicing your opinion. "If you resort to personal attacks, you have already lost the debate..."

Advertisement

Contact Us About This Article

Have a question or comment about this article? We'd love to hear from you.

About Fair Side News

At Fair Side News, we believe in presenting news with perspectives from both sides of the political spectrum. Our goal is to help readers understand different viewpoints and find common ground on important issues.