Breaking
Sponsor Advertisement
UVU Prepares for Kirk Memorial Amid Planned Student Protests
Image for: UVU Prepares for Kirk Memorial Amid Planned Student Protests

UVU Prepares for Kirk Memorial Amid Planned Student Protests

UVU students plan a protest. It targets a Charlie Kirk memorial. TPUSA hosts the event. It marks his 2025 assassination. Protesters oppose Kirk. They seek to disrupt. UVU canceled classes. The memorial is private. Security will be high. Kirk was killed. Robinson faces charges.
Jump to The Flipside Perspectives

OREM, Utah – Utah Valley University (UVU) is preparing for a significant gathering on September 10, marking the one-year anniversary of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination on campus. The day will feature a memorial event hosted by Turning Point USA (TPUSA), “Freedom Built to Last, Honoring Charlie Kirk,” which is scheduled to take place at the UCCU Center. Simultaneously, several left-wing student organizations are planning demonstrations outside the event, aiming to make attendance "as uncomfortable as possible."

"All that we’ll be able to do is stand outside, but if we can make it as uncomfortable as possible for people to get in," Collin Grannis, SDS chapter president.

The TPUSA memorial event, organized privately by the conservative group rather than UVU, is set to begin at 6:30 p.m. with doors opening at 4 p.m. Attendees are required to register and receive an official ticket for entry. The program is slated to include speeches from conservative commentator Glenn Beck, Christian apologist Frank Turek, and TPUSA field officer Andrew Sypher, according to reports. Organizers describe the gathering as an opportunity to remember Kirk’s life and to encourage his supporters to continue his work.

Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot on September 10, 2025, while speaking before thousands of people at an outdoor event on the same UVU campus. The incident led to the arrest of Tyler Robinson, 23, who has since pleaded not guilty to aggravated murder and other related charges. A Utah judge ruled on September 1 that prosecutors presented sufficient evidence for Robinson to stand trial, and prosecutors are currently seeking the death penalty.

In response to the upcoming memorial, student groups including Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) at UVU, the Community Defense Club of UVU, the national SDS organization, and The Black Menaces have announced plans for a protest. In a joint statement reported by The College Fix, these organizations declared, “We will not stand for this.” They contend that UVU's decision to permit the event, especially while normal campus operations are closed, implies an endorsement of Turning Point USA and Kirk’s political views. The groups are urging students to demonstrate against what they have characterized as “racism, homophobia, bigotry and hate.”

Collin Grannis, president of the UVU SDS chapter, was reportedly recorded discussing the protest plans, stating, "All that we’ll be able to do is stand outside, but if we can make it as uncomfortable as possible for people to get in." He also reportedly indicated that demonstrators intend to convey to the university that "there shouldn’t be a memorial on campus."

For its part, UVU announced last month that classes would be canceled on September 10, with most campus operations closing for the day. Interim President Wayne Vaught stated that the day was intended to provide “space for reflection, service and connection” for the university community, emphasizing healing. The university clarified that the UCCU Center would remain open to accommodate the separately organized TPUSA memorial.

Sage Lloyd, president of UVU’s Turning Point USA chapter, acknowledged the protesters’ right to demonstrate but appealed for peaceful conduct. "There is room on campus for both protest and grief," Lloyd stated, while cautioning against violence, disruption, or attempts to impede remembrance.

The disagreement over how Kirk should be commemorated has been ongoing since his death. Following the September 2025 shooting, UVU established a memorial committee to explore options for a permanent commemoration, promising to incorporate input from students, Kirk’s family, elected officials, and other community members. Additionally, the university launched "Our Better Selves for a Better America," an initiative focused on civil dialogue, conflict resolution, and preventing political disagreement from escalating into dehumanization or violence.

Security is anticipated to be heightened across the campus for Thursday’s anniversary gathering, as supporters, speakers, and protesters converge on the site where Charlie Kirk was killed a year prior.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

The planned protest at the Charlie Kirk memorial reflects a legitimate concern among student groups regarding the promotion of views they deem harmful and bigoted on campus. While freedom of speech is important, it does not equate to freedom from consequences or criticism, especially when rhetoric is perceived to contribute to an unwelcoming or hostile environment for marginalized students. Allowing a prominent conservative organization to host an event celebrating a figure whose views have been widely criticized for being racist, homophobic, and hateful, sends a message that the university implicitly endorses such ideologies. Progressive values emphasize social justice, equity, and the collective well-being of all students. Protesting is a vital tool for advocating for these values and challenging systemic issues. The students' demand that the university not host a memorial for someone whose platform they believe caused harm is an assertion of their right to a safe and inclusive educational space, where all students feel respected and valued, rather than subjected to rhetoric that demeans their identities.

Conservative View

The planned protests at Charlie Kirk’s memorial are deeply concerning, infringing upon the fundamental rights of free speech and assembly that are cornerstones of individual liberty. Turning Point USA, like any organization, has the right to host a private event on a university campus, especially one commemorating a figure who championed conservative values and engaged in robust public discourse. To attempt to disrupt a memorial service, particularly one marking a tragic assassination, demonstrates a profound lack of respect for differing viewpoints and the grieving process. Such actions stifle the open exchange of ideas essential for a vibrant intellectual environment. Conservative principles emphasize personal responsibility and the importance of engaging with ideas, even those one disagrees with, through rational debate, not through attempts to silence or intimidate. The university's decision to allow the event, while maintaining neutrality, upholds the principles of free expression. Efforts to shut down conservative voices on campus, under the guise of combating "hate speech," often amount to a selective application of principles that ultimately undermines the very concept of free discourse and intellectual diversity.

Common Ground

Despite the clear divisions, all parties involved share a common interest in fostering a safe and respectful campus environment. Both those organizing the memorial and those planning the protest can agree on the importance of peaceful assembly and the right to express one's views without fear of violence. The university's initiative, "Our Better Selves for a Better America," highlights a shared desire for civil dialogue and conflict resolution, suggesting an underlying agreement that political disagreements should not escalate into dehumanization or violence. There is also a shared understanding that the campus community is grappling with the tragic circumstances of Charlie Kirk's assassination. While differing on how to commemorate him, all can agree that violence is unacceptable and that legal processes for accountability, such as the ongoing trial of Tyler Robinson, must be respected. Moving forward, efforts to ensure safety and facilitate constructive, non-violent expression from all perspectives could be a genuine point of collaboration.

What's your view on this story? Share your thoughts and remember to consider multiple perspectives and being respectful when forming and voicing your opinion. "If you resort to personal attacks, you have already lost the debate..."

Advertisement

Contact Us About This Article

Have a question or comment about this article? We'd love to hear from you.

About Fair Side News

At Fair Side News, we believe in presenting news with perspectives from both sides of the political spectrum. Our goal is to help readers understand different viewpoints and find common ground on important issues.