Breaking
Sponsor Advertisement
Victoria's Secret Faces Boycott Over Model Rejections
Image for: Victoria's Secret Faces Boycott Over Model Rejections

Victoria's Secret Faces Boycott Over Model Rejections

Victoria's Secret has reportedly rejected several prominent models from its upcoming fashion show. Former Angel Romee Strijd shared her disappointment in a viral TikTok video. Her agency informed her she "wouldn’t fit in the show this year.
Jump to The Flipside Perspectives

Victoria’s Secret is facing calls for a boycott following reports that several well-known supermodels, including former "Angels," were rejected from its upcoming fashion show. The controversy gained significant traction after Dutch model Romee Strijd shared her emotional experience in a TikTok video on Monday, just days before the event scheduled for Sunday in Los Angeles.

"You look great…but they thought you wouldn’t fit in the show this year." Romee Strijd, recounting conversation with her agency

Strijd, 31, a mother of two and a prominent figure in the fashion industry with millions of social media followers, revealed that her agency informed her she would not be participating in this year’s show. Speaking through tears, Strijd recounted the call, stating, “It’s a no, which is fine because rejection is part of modeling, and that’s totally fine.” She elaborated on the conversation: “So, my agency just called and I said, ‘Okay, what’s happening?’ And she said, ‘You look great…but they thought you wouldn’t fit in the show this year.’” Strijd, who became a Victoria’s Secret Angel in 2015 and walked in shows since 2014, had spent months preparing, including intensive training through the summer and traveling to New York in September for casting. She expressed her dissatisfaction with the treatment, noting she did "not like the way she was treated" and would likely not audition again, preferring to keep her "good memories" as an Angel.

The revelation quickly sparked a wider discussion among models and fans. Freida Aasen, a Norwegian runway model who regularly walked for Victoria’s Secret before its hiatus, replied to Strijd’s video confirming her own rejection. Reports also indicate that Lais Ribeiro, another former Angel renowned for wearing the "fantasy bra" in 2017, was similarly turned away from the event.

The news ignited a firestorm of fan outrage across online platforms, with many expressing disappointment and calling for a boycott of the lingerie giant. Fashion Times reported that one fan warned the company that favoring influencers over seasoned supermodels would "bite" them "in the a**." Another critic online stated that the company was "rejecting beloved veterans for influencers," capturing the sentiment of many who feel the brand is abandoning its roots.

This controversy is not the first for Victoria’s Secret regarding its runway shows and brand image. The company canceled its iconic fashion show in 2019 following a contentious 2018 interview. Ed Razek, then the company’s chief marketing officer, told Vogue that Victoria’s Secret did not want plus-size or transgender models on its runway, describing the show as a “fantasy” built around unattainable beauty standards. Razek has since retired, and the brand has made efforts to evolve its image.

The show returned in 2024 with a more inclusive cast, featuring transgender models and promoting "body diversity." Last year, the brand began reincorporating some earlier models, including former Angels, into its lineup. However, despite these efforts, some fans continued to express a desire for the return of the models who originally brought the brand to prominence.

Last year’s event notably featured a mix of traditional models and social media influencers, including creators Gabriela Moura and Quenlin Blackwell, alongside athletes Angel Reese and Sunisa Lee. The current backlash suggests that the brand’s strategy of integrating influencers at the expense of established supermodels is meeting significant resistance from a segment of its long-standing fanbase.

Victoria’s Secret has not yet publicly commented on Strijd’s rejection or the broader boycott calls. The full list of models for this year’s show, set to open on Sunday, remains unreleased, leaving many to speculate on the final composition of the runway and the ultimate impact of the fan backlash on the brand’s image and sales. The evolving landscape of fashion and celebrity, balancing traditional allure with digital influence, continues to present complex challenges for legacy brands.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

From a progressive viewpoint, the rejection of veteran supermodels in favor of social media influencers by Victoria's Secret raises questions about the fashion industry's evolving values and potential systemic issues. While a company has the right to make business decisions, the manner in which these decisions impact individuals and broader societal perceptions warrants scrutiny. The emotional distress expressed by Romee Strijd, a dedicated professional, highlights concerns about valuing transient online fame over sustained professional experience and talent.

This situation can be viewed through the lens of equity and fair treatment within a highly competitive industry. The shift away from established models for influencers may reflect an industry trend that prioritizes algorithmic reach over artistic merit or professional development, potentially marginalizing experienced individuals. Furthermore, the historical context of Victoria's Secret's past controversies regarding body diversity and representation cannot be ignored. While the brand has attempted to diversify, the current backlash suggests an ongoing struggle to authentically connect with audiences who desire both inclusive representation and respect for the brand's heritage and the professionals who built it. The move may inadvertently perpetuate a system that prioritizes ephemeral trends over enduring talent and ethical treatment.

Conservative View

From a conservative perspective, the decisions made by Victoria's Secret regarding its model selection are fundamentally private business choices operating within a free market. A company has the inherent right to define its brand image, target audience, and marketing strategy without external interference, whether from consumers, activists, or government. If Victoria's Secret believes that incorporating social media influencers better aligns with its current business objectives or appeals to a new demographic, that is a prerogative of corporate management.

Consumers, in turn, exercise their individual liberty through their purchasing decisions. If a segment of the customer base disapproves of the company's direction, they are free to withhold their patronage, as evidenced by the calls for a boycott. This mechanism of consumer choice, not compelled inclusion or government mandate, is the appropriate arbiter of a company's success or failure in a capitalist system. The emphasis should be on personal responsibility for both the company to make sound business decisions and for consumers to make informed choices based on their values. Calls for boycotts are an expression of free speech and market power, but they do not negate the company's right to operate as it sees fit.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive perspectives can find common ground in acknowledging the importance of consumer feedback and market responsiveness for any brand. For Victoria's Secret, like any business, understanding and adapting to customer preferences is crucial for long-term viability. While companies maintain the right to define their brand, ignoring significant segments of their customer base can have demonstrable financial consequences, as the boycott calls indicate.

There is also shared recognition that clear and respectful communication is vital in professional relationships, regardless of whether they involve traditional employees or freelance contractors like models. The sentiment expressed by Romee Strijd about "not liking the way she was treated" underscores a universal expectation of professionalism. Ultimately, both sides can agree that a successful brand navigates the complex interplay between tradition and innovation, aiming to create a product or experience that resonates with its audience while treating all stakeholders, including its talent, with dignity and respect.

What's your view on this story? Share your thoughts and remember to consider multiple perspectives and being respectful when forming and voicing your opinion. "If you resort to personal attacks, you have already lost the debate..."

Advertisement

Contact Us About This Article

Have a question or comment about this article? We'd love to hear from you.

About Fair Side News

At Fair Side News, we believe in presenting news with perspectives from both sides of the political spectrum. Our goal is to help readers understand different viewpoints and find common ground on important issues.