Breaking
Fair Side News (formerly BalancedRight News), was created to help readers move b… | ● BREAKING Breaking: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Resigns From Trump Cabinet | ● BREAKING The Final Checkered Flag: NASCAR Mourns the Tragic Passing of Two-Time Cup Champion Kyle Busch | President Trump Backs Permanent Daylight Saving Time Bill | Iran War Costs Soar as US Aircraft Losses Mount | Trump, Netanyahu Reportedly Clash Over Iran Strategy | Trump Issues EO to Bolster Financial System Integrity | DOJ Prepares Raúl Castro Indictment for 1996 Shootdown | Trump-Backed Challenger Defeats Incumbent Massie in Kentucky Primary | SCOTUS Justices Clash Publicly Over Redistricting Procedure | FBI Reports Historic National Crime Reduction in 2025 | Fair Side News (formerly BalancedRight News), was created to help readers move b… | ● BREAKING Breaking: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Resigns From Trump Cabinet | ● BREAKING The Final Checkered Flag: NASCAR Mourns the Tragic Passing of Two-Time Cup Champion Kyle Busch | President Trump Backs Permanent Daylight Saving Time Bill | Iran War Costs Soar as US Aircraft Losses Mount | Trump, Netanyahu Reportedly Clash Over Iran Strategy | Trump Issues EO to Bolster Financial System Integrity | DOJ Prepares Raúl Castro Indictment for 1996 Shootdown | Trump-Backed Challenger Defeats Incumbent Massie in Kentucky Primary | SCOTUS Justices Clash Publicly Over Redistricting Procedure | FBI Reports Historic National Crime Reduction in 2025 |
Sponsor Advertisement
Influencer Alleges Musk Used Starlink, Data to Sway 2024 Election
Image for: Influencer Alleges Musk Used Starlink, Data to Sway 2024 Election

Influencer Alleges Musk Used Starlink, Data to Sway 2024 Election

Conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair alleges tech billionaire Elon Musk privately discussed using Starlink satellites and proprietary election data to influence the 2024 presidential race.
Jump to The Flipside Perspectives

Conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair has made a series of claims alleging that tech billionaire Elon Musk privately discussed using his Starlink satellite network and advanced election data capabilities to influence the 2024 presidential election. The allegations, which surfaced in a TikTok video posted this week, describe private conversations St. Clair claims to have had with Musk beginning in October 2024. As of now, Musk has not publicly addressed these claims, and no publicly available evidence supports them.

"In October, Elon tells me he is ready to release his ‘anomaly in the matrix.’ He says he has 10K lasers in space, referring to his satellites. He says this is not a piece they’ll see on the chess board." — Ashley St. Clair, Conservative Influencer

In her video, St. Clair recounted a conversation where Musk allegedly referenced an "anomaly in the matrix" involving "10,000 lasers in space," which she interpreted as a reference to SpaceX’s Starlink satellite network. She claimed Musk told her this system would not be "a piece they’ll see on the chessboard," a statement she suggested implied covert capabilities related to the election. St. Clair stated she intentionally avoided asking further questions due to fears of legal repercussions or being drawn into future investigations, to which she claims Musk responded, "Very wise."

Beyond the satellite allegations, St. Clair also claimed Musk showed her internal data from his pro-President Trump political operation, America PAC. She described this data as "real-time delta vote metrics" during the campaign, asserting that it appeared far more sophisticated than traditional political campaign operations she had encountered, which she characterized as relying on less reliable methods like door-knocking and outdated voter outreach.

The intensity of St. Clair’s allegations escalated as she described election night at Mar-a-Lago. According to her account, after Musk had left the property, he allegedly contacted her, claiming his organization possessed the most accurate real-time election data available and already knew President Donald Trump would win hours before major networks officially projected the race. St. Clair stated she asked Musk, "How do you have real-time data on elections?"

Throughout her video, St. Clair repeatedly expressed her growing unease regarding the implications of advanced technology being leveraged in politics and elections. She asserted that she documented these conversations and communications because she feared potential retaliation or future legal disputes. "I have all of this backed up with many people with explicit instructions should anything happen to me," she stated in the video. St. Clair also claimed she rejected offers to remain silent and now feels compelled to speak publicly, believing that unchecked emerging technology could pose severe risks to democratic processes.

She drew a comparison between the alleged circumstances surrounding Musk and the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which involved the misuse of Facebook user data during the 2016 election cycle. However, St. Clair argued that the alleged situation involving Musk was "a million times worse." Additionally, she reflected on her past role within the MAGA movement, expressing regret for helping popularize "Dark MAGA" imagery. She specifically mentioned giving Musk a black MAGA hat that later became widely associated with the online movement, according to reports from Where is the Buzz.

Starlink, operated by SpaceX, is a satellite internet system primarily designed to provide broadband internet access globally. Its publicly stated purpose does not include election monitoring or interference capabilities. Election officials and cybersecurity experts have consistently stated there is no evidence that voting systems in the 2024 election were manipulated through satellite technology or external communications systems.

The allegations quickly gained traction across social media platforms on Tuesday, sparking widespread debate among critics and supporters of Musk. Discussions centered on the credibility of St. Clair’s claims and the broader influence of technology companies and wealthy political donors in American elections. The absence of a public response from Musk has left the claims unverified, contributing to the ongoing speculation surrounding the influencer’s video.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

Ashley St. Clair's allegations, regardless of their veracity, draw attention to critical progressive concerns about the unchecked power of tech billionaires and the potential for advanced technology to undermine democratic principles. Progressives emphasize that the immense wealth and influence concentrated in the hands of a few individuals, coupled with sophisticated technological capabilities, pose systemic risks to social equity and fair elections. The claims of "real-time delta vote metrics" and covert satellite operations highlight the potential for voter manipulation, microtargeting, and the creation of an uneven playing field that disadvantages ordinary citizens. This situation reinforces the progressive call for stronger regulatory frameworks for tech companies, advocating for policies that prevent the weaponization of data and technology in political campaigns. The comparison to Cambridge Analytica resonates deeply, reminding progressives of the urgent need for comprehensive data privacy laws and accountability mechanisms to protect the collective well-being and ensure that democratic processes are truly reflective of the popular will, rather than being swayed by the hidden levers of powerful elites.

Conservative View

The allegations made by Ashley St. Clair, while unverified, underscore profound conservative concerns regarding election integrity and the potential for undue influence by powerful private actors and advanced technology. For conservatives, the sanctity of the electoral process is paramount, requiring transparency and verifiable outcomes. The idea that a tech billionaire could possess "real-time delta vote metrics" or deploy covert satellite capabilities raises serious questions about the fairness and security of elections. Such claims, even if unsubstantiated, highlight the imperative for robust oversight and clear ethical boundaries for technology companies operating in the political sphere. Conservatives advocate for a level playing field where individual votes are counted accurately and are not susceptible to manipulation by opaque algorithms or technological advantages wielded by a select few. This situation reinforces calls for greater transparency in campaign finance, data usage, and the operations of politically engaged organizations to ensure that democratic processes remain accountable to the citizenry, not to powerful, unelected figures. The emphasis remains on protecting the integrity of the ballot box and maintaining public trust in election results through verifiable and transparent means.

Common Ground

Despite differing perspectives on the specifics of Ashley St. Clair's claims, there are genuine areas of common ground regarding the broader implications of technology and wealth in elections. Both conservatives and progressives share a fundamental commitment to the integrity of democratic processes and the importance of public trust in election outcomes. There is bipartisan agreement on the need for transparent elections, free from undue influence, whether from foreign adversaries or powerful domestic actors. Both sides can agree on the necessity of thoroughly investigating serious allegations of election interference, ensuring that any claims are either substantiated with evidence or definitively debunked to prevent the erosion of public confidence. Furthermore, there is a shared interest in discussing the ethical guidelines for the use of advanced technology and data in political campaigns. Crafting policies that promote transparency, protect voter data, and ensure accountability for tech platforms and their leaders could serve as a constructive bipartisan effort to safeguard the democratic process for all citizens.

What's your view on this story? Share your thoughts and remember to consider multiple perspectives and being respectful when forming and voicing your opinion. "If you resort to personal attacks, you have already lost the debate..."

Advertisement

Contact Us About This Article

Have a question or comment about this article? We'd love to hear from you.

About Fair Side News

At Fair Side News, we believe in presenting news with perspectives from both sides of the political spectrum. Our goal is to help readers understand different viewpoints and find common ground on important issues.