Breaking
Sponsor Advertisement
Universal Friend's 18th-Century Movement Gains Renewed Focus
Image for: Universal Friend's 18th-Century Movement Gains Renewed Focus

Universal Friend's 18th-Century Movement Gains Renewed Focus

Jemima Wilkinson, an 18th-century religious leader known as the "Universal Friend," rejected gendered identity and established a movement promoting equality during the American Revolution. This historical figure is receiving renewed attention as the United States approaches its 250th anniversary.
Jump to The Flipside Perspectives

As the United States prepares to mark its 250th anniversary, historical accounts are shedding new light on Jemima Wilkinson, an influential 18th-century religious leader. Wilkinson, a Rhode Island native, founded a significant religious movement that championed principles of equality and individual liberty in the nascent years of the American republic, while notably rejecting a gendered identity.

Born in 1752, Wilkinson’s life took a pivotal turn in 1776 at the age of 23. Historical records indicate that Wilkinson suffered a severe illness, characterized by a high fever and reported visions of angels, which led family members to believe the condition would prove fatal. Following a remarkable recovery, Wilkinson asserted that the original person had died and that a divine spirit had subsequently entered the body. This profound experience led Wilkinson to reject the birth name and adopt the moniker “Universal Friend,” instructing followers to refrain from using gendered pronouns when referring to them. In a further symbolic gesture of this transformed identity, the Universal Friend began to wear long robes and clothing designed to avoid association with either men or women.

The Universal Friend went on to establish the Society of Universal Friends, a religious movement that attracted hundreds of followers during the late 18th century. The movement’s core tenets included the belief that all individuals were equal before God, irrespective of race or gender, and emphasized the inherent worth of every person. A radical demand for its time, the Society required its adherents to free any enslaved people under their control. This commitment to racial equality was further demonstrated by the fact that some formerly enslaved individuals later chose to join the community themselves. The movement also broke with traditional societal norms by allowing women to assume significant leadership positions as preachers and administrators within the Society.

The Universal Friend also made a specific prophecy, predicting that Judgment Day would occur on or around April 1, 1790. When this date passed without the anticipated event, many followers interpreted the lack of incident as an act of divine intervention, sparing them, rather than abandoning their faith in the movement.

Facing increasing societal hostility and scrutiny in their original location, the Universal Friend encouraged followers to relocate. They eventually settled in what was then the western frontier of New York’s Finger Lakes region, establishing new communities founded upon the movement’s religious principles. These settlements were characterized by residents organizing their own households and businesses, with participation in religious meetings not being mandatory. The diverse communities included single women, families, formerly enslaved people, and orphans, all living together. According to historical accounts, these settlements achieved economic success and earned respect from neighboring communities, including Native American groups, as reported by the Daily Mail.

The movement later encountered legal challenges, particularly concerning land ownership, when several former followers disputed the Society’s claims. Additionally, the Universal Friend faced a blasphemy charge. However, a court ultimately dismissed the blasphemy case, ruling that such charges were no longer prosecutable under the new nation’s constitutional protections for religious liberty and free speech. While many of the property disputes were resolved in favor of the Society of Universal Friends, these decisions often came after the Universal Friend's death in 1819 at the age of 66.

Despite its significant contributions, the Universal Friend’s movement has often been overlooked in broader historical narratives of early America. Nevertheless, it stands as one of the nation’s earliest religious communities to organize explicitly around principles of racial equality, expanded roles for women, and robust religious freedom during the foundational years immediately following the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The renewed attention to figures like the Universal Friend offers a richer, more nuanced understanding of the diverse social and religious landscape of the early American republic.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

From a progressive perspective, the Universal Friend's movement stands as a remarkable, early example of challenging societal norms and advocating for social justice. The rejection of a gendered identity by the Universal Friend was profoundly progressive for the 18th century, pushing against rigid gender binaries and roles long before such concepts gained broader recognition. This pioneering stance on identity aligns with modern progressive values that champion inclusivity and respect for diverse identities.

Crucially, the Society of Universal Friends mandated the freeing of enslaved people and welcomed formerly enslaved individuals into their community, actively working towards racial equality at a time when slavery was deeply entrenched. This commitment to anti-slavery and racial justice demonstrates a clear dedication to systemic change and equity. The movement also empowered women, allowing them to assume leadership roles as preachers and administrators, directly challenging patriarchal structures and advocating for expanded roles for women in public and religious life. These actions reflect a progressive commitment to dismantling oppression, promoting collective well-being, and fostering a society where all individuals, regardless of race or gender, possess equal opportunities and dignity.

Conservative View

The historical account of the Universal Friend’s movement offers several points of resonance with conservative principles, particularly concerning individual liberty and the formation of self-sustaining communities. The Universal Friend’s decision to establish settlements in the western frontier of New York exemplifies a spirit of self-reliance and pioneering, where individuals organized their own households and businesses, free from excessive governmental oversight. This aligns with the conservative emphasis on limited government and the power of individuals and private associations to build and maintain society.

Furthermore, the dismissal of the blasphemy case against the Universal Friend highlights the foundational American principle of religious freedom. The court’s decision, recognizing that such charges were not prosecutable under the new nation’s protections for religious liberty and free speech, underscores the importance of shielding individual conscience from state interference. This legal precedent reflects a core conservative tenet: the protection of constitutional rights, especially those guaranteeing freedom of religion, which allows diverse beliefs to flourish without governmental coercion. The voluntary nature of joining the Society and the choice to live by its principles also speaks to personal responsibility and the liberty to associate and practice one's faith as one sees fit.

Common Ground

Despite differing ideological frameworks, conservatives and progressives can find common ground in appreciating aspects of the Universal Friend’s historical movement. Both perspectives can acknowledge the profound significance of religious freedom, a cornerstone of American liberty, as demonstrated by the court’s dismissal of the blasphemy charges. This protection of individual conscience and the right to practice one’s faith without government interference is a shared value, essential for a pluralistic society.

Furthermore, the spirit of community building and the pursuit of self-sufficiency evident in the Universal Friend’s settlements offer common ground. The ability of diverse individuals to come together, organize their lives, and establish economically successful communities speaks to a shared human desire for belonging and stability. While conservatives might emphasize the individual agency and limited government aspects, and progressives might highlight the inclusive and equitable nature of these communities, both can recognize the positive impact of people uniting to create a shared future. The historical context of a nascent nation grappling with its ideals also provides a shared point of reflection on the ongoing evolution of American principles.

What's your view on this story? Share your thoughts and remember to consider multiple perspectives and being respectful when forming and voicing your opinion. "If you resort to personal attacks, you have already lost the debate..."

Advertisement

Contact Us About This Article

Have a question or comment about this article? We'd love to hear from you.

About Fair Side News

At Fair Side News, we believe in presenting news with perspectives from both sides of the political spectrum. Our goal is to help readers understand different viewpoints and find common ground on important issues.